Exploration of the Dempster-Shafer Theory for Diagnosing Hardware Damage: Comparative Study with the Certainty Factor Method
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Comparative research is a research method that compares two or more research objects to expand understanding of them. In this context, we compare the Certainty Factor method and the Dempster-Shafer method in diagnosing computer hardware damage. The Certainty Factor method measures an expert's confidence in the solution that will be provided. On the other hand, the Dempster-Shafer method is a useful theory in situations where uncertainty dominates. This research focuses on comparing the effectiveness of the two methods in detecting computer hardware damage. An experimental approach is used to look for causal relationships between variables controlled by the researcher. The research results show that the Certainty Factor method has an average success rate of 14.51%, while the Dempster-Shafer method reaches 84.27% in terms of error difference. From these results, it can be concluded that the Certainty Factor method is more effective in diagnosing computer hardware damage.
Keywords: INISTA, journal, MS.Word template
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with Journal of Informatics, Information System, Software Engineering and Applications (INISTA) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
[2] J. Anderson and L. Rainie, “As AI Spreads, Experts Predict the Best and Worst Changes in Digital Life by 2035,” Pew Res. Cent., no. June, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/06/21/as-ai-spreads-experts-predict-the-best-and-worst-changes-in-digital-life-by-2035/
[3] S. H. Liao, “Expert system methodologies and applications-a decade review from 1995 to 2004,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 93–103, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2004.08.003.
[4] M. N. Abu Al-Qumboz and S. . Abu-Naser, “Spinach Expert System: Diseases and Symptoms,” Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 16–22, 2019.
[5] R. Apriliyani, F. Ayuning Tyas, E. Kristi Permatasari, T. Informatika, and S. Muhammadiyah Paguyangan Brebes, “Perbandingan Metode Forward Chaining dan Backward Chaining pada Sistem Pakar Identifikasi Gaya Belajar,” Icom J. Inform. dan Teknol. Komput., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 84–92, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://ejurnalunsam.id/index.php/jicom/article/view/6290
[6] R. Hamidi, H. Anra, and H. S. Pratiwi, “Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Pakar Dengan Metode Certainty Factor dan Metode Dempster-Shafer Pada Penyakit Kelinci,” J. Sist. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 142–147, 2017.
[7] J. Xia, Y. Feng, L. Liu, D. Liu, and L. Fei, “An Evidential Reliability Indicator-Based Fusion Rule for Dempster-Shafer Theory and its Applications in Classification,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 24912–24924, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2831216.
[8] K. Wen, Y. Song, C. Wu, and T. Li, “A Novel Measure of Uncertainty in the Dempster-Shafer Theory,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 51550–51559, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2979605.
[9] D. Kiray and F. A. Sianturi, “Diagnose Expert System Computer Malfunction Certainty Factor Method,” J. Comput. Networks, Archit. High Perform. Comput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 63–71, 2020, doi: 10.47709/cnapc.v2i1.358.
[10] Y. Lizar, J. Jama, F. Rizal, A. Guci, T. Loveri, and L. S. Muchlis, “Implementation of computer damage diagnosis by expert system based using forward chaining and certainty factor methods,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 141–144, 2019.
[11] Y. Yunitasari, A. Voutama, and N. Sulistiyowati, “Perbandingan Metode Certainty Factor dan Dempster Shafer untuk Sistem Pakar Depresi Pasca Melahirkan,” Techno.Com, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 362–371, 2021, doi: 10.33633/tc.v20i3.4905.
[12] J. Kalyzta and M. Syafrullah, “Sistem Pakar Diagnosa Kerusakan Komputer Dengan Algoritma Certainty Factor Pada Lab Ict Budi Luhur,” Skanika, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2023, doi: 10.36080/skanika.v6i1.2996.
[13] S. Peñafiel, N. Baloian, H. Sanson, and J. A. Pino, “Applying Dempster–Shafer theory for developing a flexible, accurate and interpretable classifier,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 148, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113262.