Perbandingan Kontroler POX, Ryu dan ONOS Pada Arsitektur Software Defined Network (SDN) Menggunakan Topologi Linear
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstrak
Software defined network merupakan konsep baru yang memisahkan data plane dengan control plane. Kontroler menjadi suatu hal yang penting dalam membangun arsitektur software defined network, sehingga dibutuhkan informasi terkait performansi kontroler untuk mengetahui tingkat kemampuan suatu kontroler, bebarapa kontroler yang ada diantaranya POX, Ryu dan ONOS. Pada penenelitan ini menggunakan topologi jaringan linear yang menggunakan 10 switch dan 10 host, 12 switch dan 12 host, 14 switch dan 14 host dan 16 Switch 16 host pada background traffic 50 Mbps hingga 200 Mbps. Dari pengujian ini diperoleh hasil bahwa kenaikan nilai troughput, delay dan jitter berbanding lurus dengan meningkatnya jumlah switch, kontroler POX memiliki performa terbaik dibandingkan dengan kontroler Ryu dan ONOS dengan nilai troughput yang didapatkan sebesar 5.139,456 Kbits/sec hingga 5.142,139 Kbits/sec, untuk nilai delay yang didapatkan sebesar 0,078 ms hingga 0,110 ms sedangkan untuk nilai jitter diperoleh 0,037 ms hingga 0,070 ms.
Abstract
Software defined network is a new concept that separates the data plane from the control plane. The controller is an important thing in building a software defined network architecture, so information regarding controller performance is needed to determine the level of capability of a controller, some of the existing controllers include POX, Ryu and ONOS. This research uses a linear network topology that uses 10 switches and 10 host, 12 switches and 12 host, 14 switches and 14 host and 16 switches and 16 host on 50 Mbps to 200 Mbps background traffic. From this test, the results show that the increase in throughput, delay and jitter values is directly proportional to the increase in the number of switches, the POX controller has the best performance compared to the Ryu and ONOS controllers with the throughput value obtained from 5,139,456 Kbits/sec to 5,142,139 Kbits/sec. , for the delay value obtained is 0.078 ms to 0.110 ms while the jitter value is obtained from 0.037 ms to 0.070 ms.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
[2] I. M. S. Mokhamad Aguk Nur Anggraini, "Performa Clustering Controllerpada Arsitektur Software Defined Network," Journal of Informatics and Computer Science, vol. II, pp. 1-8, 2020.
[3] V. P. Rikie Kartadie, "FLOODLIGHT VS ONOS DALAM UNJUK KERJA," JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Informatika), vol. IV, pp. 111-121, 2019.
[4] A. H. M. H. Mohamed Eltaj, "Performance Evaluation of SDN Controllers: FloodLight, POX and NOX," International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS), vol. VII, no. 8, pp. 28-43, 2020.
[5] E. S. P. W. Y. Moh Wahyudi Putra, "Analisis Perbandingan Performansi Kontroler Floodlight, Maestro, RYU, POX dan ONOS dalam Arsitektur Software Defined Network (SDN)," Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, vol. II, pp. 3779-3787, 2018.
[6] N. A. A.-a. W. H. Mahmood Z. Abdullah, "Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Software," International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Science, vol. II, no. 11, pp. 45-50, 2018.
[7] S. S. H. H. H. Sm Shamim, "Performance Analysis of Different Openflow based Controller Over Software Defined Networking," Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology: CSoftware & Data Engineering, vol. XVIII, no. 1, pp. 11-16, 2018.
[8] D. T. W. P. S. S. M. R. L. S. M. Faizal Mulya, "ANALISIS LOAD BALANCING PADA JARINGAN SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORK (SDN) MENGGUNAKAN ALGORITMA OPTIMASI KOLONI SEMUT," e-Proceeding of Engineering, vol. VI, p. 1385, 2019.
[9] W. Y. P. K. Romy Dwi Andika Manullang, "Implementasi K-Shortest Path Routing pada Jaringan Software Defined Network," Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, vol. II, pp. 2462-2468, 2018.
[10] M. F. M. Ryhan Uddin, "Performance Analysis of SDN Based Firewalls: POX vs ODL," International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering (ICAEE), 2019.
[11] U. D. D. Idris Z. Bholebawa, "Performance Analysis of SDN/OpenFlow Controllers:POX Versus Floodlight," Wireless Pers Commun, 2017.
[12] N. Hanan, "Mengenal Salah Satu Controller dalam SDN," 31 Oktober 2018. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/core-network-laboratory-tech-page/mengenal-salah-satu-controller-dalam-sdn-706ed4624660. [Accessed 31 Agustus 2021].
[13] E. Mulyana, "ONOS," 22 Desember 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.telematika.org/post/onos/. [Accessed 31 Agustus 2021].